v2088-236
18
ing the enforcement of Appellee Pillsbury's award.
It is our belief that this issue has become moot by
^drtue of the fact that after the appeal was taken
from the order denying the temporary injunction, the
X)roceeding upon which the request for the same was
predicated was dismissed and a final decree entered,
from which decree this appeal is now^ being prose-
cuted. However, in case this Court should see fit to
review the ruling of the lower Court denying the tem-
porary injunction, we refer this Court to our brief
on file, suggesting however that the point raised is
stare decisis (Northwestern Stevedoring Co. v. Mar-
shall, 41 Fed. (2d) 28, 29 (CCA. 9)).
For the reasons hereinabove set forth, we submit
that the compensation award heretofore entered by
Appellee Pillsbury and approved by the lower Court
should be affirmed.
Dated, San Francisco,
June 29, 1938.
Respectfully submitted,
Frank J. Hennessy,
United States Attorney,
- MURMAN,
Assistant United States Attorney,
Attorneys for Appellee,
Warren TI. Pillsbury,
(Appendix Follows.)
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2088
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2088
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2088#page/n235/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
oil, eastern, equipment, wright, machinery, complete, property, petitioner, fay, bill, petition, 1937, brown, mortgage, referee
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
eastern oil, los angeles, chattel mortgage, centralia oil, spriggs brown, roller bearing, sprigg brown, personal property, william spriggs, william sprigg, southern district, tubing connections, sprocket chain, feed automatic, drive sprocket
Document Status: UGLY