v2208-475

No. 9442

Vinihi States

^ar tire ^^intlj Ciirxruit )

BARNARD-CURTISS COMPANY,

a corporation,

Appellant,

vs.

ERNEST MAEHL,

Appellee.

^xuf af ^pp^lke

Russell E. Smith

Kendrick Smith

1. 1. McDonald

Attorneys for Appellee.

Upon Appeal from The District Court of The United

States for The District of Montana.

iFiled

Clerk

Paul p, o*Bf

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2208

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2208

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2208#page/n474/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

maehl, contract, metcalf, 2d, barnard, work, clearing, curtiss, rules, argument, properly, leave, grubbing, written, site

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

barnard curtiss, ernest maehl, jim barnard, oral contract, dam site, written contract., written contract, civil procedure, 1935 section, supplied ., standard surety, reservoir site, quantum meriut, properly overruled, properly denied

Document Status: UGLY