v2240-523

No. 9530

IN THE u

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Hancock Oil Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Universal Oil Products Company,

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S ORAL ARGUMENT.

1. 1. Knight,

1115 Security Building, Long Beach,

Attorney for Appellant.

FILED

MAR 2 11941

pAiil P. O'BR SENJ

Parker & Baird Company, Law Printers, Los Angeles. CLtf^^

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2240

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2240

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2240#page/n522/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

universal, hancock, patent, proposed, amendments, counterclaim, oil, district, behimer, 2d, texas, discretion, bar, file, affidavit

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

proposed amendments, oil products, universal oil, patent office, keystone driller, unclean hands, standard oil, dubbs patent, cross licensing, anti trust, sherman anti, civil procedure, winkler koch, hancock oil, behimer patent

Document Status: UGLY