v2256x-789

No. 9748

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit

County of Alameda (a Body Corporate and Politic,

and a Political Subdivision of the; State of Cali-

fornia), APPELLANT,

vs.

United States of America, appellee.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF

FILED

Ralph E. Hoyt,

District Attorney in and for the County

of Alameda, State of California,

1. 1. CoaklEy,

Chief Assistant District Attorney,

Robert H. McCreary,

BLfK Assistant District Attorney,

Cecil Mosbacher,

Deputy District Attorney,

Attorneys for Appellant County of Alameda.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2256x

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2256x

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2256x#page/n788/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

county, contract, license, bridge, section, power, alameda, bridges, br, ed, 1913, void, operate, canal, cal

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

fruitvale avenue, avenue bridge, municipal corporations, article xi, tidal canal, 1909 resolution, maintain repair, section 32, operate maintain, implied power, corpus juris, 1910 license, revocable license, private railroad, harbor lines

Document Status: UGLY