v2378a-7

No. 10386

Mniteb States;

Circuit Court of Appeals

^cr^ X :^ r F A

jFor tt)c iBtinti) Circuit.

PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, and

AMERICAN POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,

Petitioners,

vs.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,

Respondent.

tlTransicript of tfje Eecorti

In Three Volumes

VOLUME m

Book of Exhibits

Kxhibit No. 15 Pacific's Reclassification of Electric Plant

Statoinents A to I, Inclusive.

Exhibit No. 16 Federal Power Commission and Public Utilities

Oommi.ssion of Oregon Staff Report on Reclassification and

Original Cost Studies of Electric Plant of Pacific Power St

Light Company.

Exhibit No. 17 Pacific's Revised Reclassification of Electric

Plant with Introluctorj- and Explanatory Statement dated

September 26, 1941.

Exhibit (No Number) Revised Summary Statement of Pacific's

ProiM)sed Reclassification, Reflecting Commission's Staff Ad-

justments Accepted by Company, Endorsed Approved October

20, 1941, by Will f. Neill, Vice President, and Submitted

After Close of Hearing.

UPON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER OF THE

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

Rotary Colorprint, 590 Folsom St., San Francisco

FILED

JUL la 194 J

PaOl p. OBRIEN,

C:.RK

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2378a

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2378a

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2378a#page/n6/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

electric, power, plant, light, system, acquisition, property, pacific, water, acquired, oregon, walla, washington, properties, generating

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

power light, electric plant, pacific power, _ _, walla walla, capital stock, generating station, hood river, december 31, light power, distribution system, utility plant, inland power, generating capacity, physical property

Document Status: UGLY