v2468-379

William Wade Ricketts

(Testimony of William Wade Kicketts.) ^

1. They are still in Canada.

2. And did yon intend to leave them in Can;

3. Yes.

4. You were still married to your common

wife in Canada'?

1. No, we had been separated a good many j

previous to that. '

1. Are your children still minors?

2. Yes.

3. They are still in Canada'?

4. Yes.

5. And you haven't tried to bring them int(

United States'? A. No.

Mr. Erickson: That's all. 199

Redirect Examination

By Mr. Young: ,

1. The children are with their mother, are

nof? A. They are.

1. And you have been contributing to

support? A. That's right.

1. And have they expressed any desire to

into the United States? A. They have i

1. Now, just so we get the common law chj

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2468

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2468

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2468#page/n378/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

young, william, wade, common, canada, erickson, doctrine, children, yon, wonder, wliether, wife, tried, tions, support

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

william wade, yon intend, wade ricketts, wade kicketts., wade eic, marriag katchewan, comm prevailing, common wife, columbie doctrine, chj 224, british columbie, bear tions, atti ., 224 atti, 199 redirect

Document Status: UGLY