v2502-571

No. 11,766

United States

Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

BuRNHAM Chemical Company, a corpora-

tion,

Appellant,

vs.

Borax Consolidated, Ltd., a corporation,

Pacific Coast Borax Company, a cor-

poration, United States Borax Com-

pany, a corporation, and American

Potash & Chemical Corporation, a cor-

poration,

Appellees.

jply of Appellees Borax Consolidated, Ltd., Pacific

Coast Borax Company, and United States Borax

Company to "Supplemental Memorandum on Be-

half of Appellant" _

FIL &I1)

Together with ii-i^ll^

a Memorandum Relative to

the Absence of a Formal Verdict-' '-'L 30 1948

PAUL P. O'BRIEN,'^

Maurice E. Hirrrm-f*^ ''"^fc.jOfcinW

Moses Lasky

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison

111 Sutter Street, San Francisco 4, Calif.

Gurney Newlin

'T'aul Sandmeyer

Newlin, Holley, Sandmeyer &

Tackabury.

1020 Edison Bldg., Los Angeles 13, Calif.

Attorneys for appellees Borax Con-

solidated, Ltd., Pacific Coast Borax

Company and United States Borax

Company.

PARKER PRINTJNG COMPANY, 180 FIRST STREET. SAN FRANCISCO

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2502

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2502

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2502#page/n570/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

cir, statute, 2d, limitations, damages, directed, private, sherman, equity, formal, public, recover, memorandum, supplemental, dismiss

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

supplemental memorandum, recover damages, public interest, pacific coast, coast borax, pipe works, genuine issue, foundry pipe, consolidated ltd., civil procedure, borax consolidated, atlanta 203, anti trust, supra ., fraudulent concealment

Document Status: UGLY