v2502-607

No. 11,766

United States

Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

BuBNHAM Chemical, Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Borax Consolidated, Ltd., et al..

Appellees.

Memorandum of Appellant in Answer to the Reply

of Borax Consolidated to the Supplementary

Memorandum in Behalf of Appellant

Sterling Care

One Montgomery Street,

San Francisco 4, Calif.,

Attorney for Appellant.

Thurman Arnold

1200 Eighteenth Street, N. W.,6 Wj^ 1 1 ET t^

Washington 6, D. C, t IWW- *-^

Of Counsel.

Aub i 1948

PARKER PRINTING COMPANY, ISO FIRST STREET. "^'J''''^''.?"^^ VBREM

OMtnK

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2502

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2502

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2502#page/n606/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

antitrust, private, statute, public, conspiracy, reply, interest, rights, memorandum, directed, statutes, business, borax, federal, damage

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

borax consolidated, triple damage, public policy, public interest, antitrust laws, anti trust, supplementary memorandum, consolidated ltd., public interest., american potash, ver dict, special site, site sign, respectfully submit, justice holmes

Document Status: UGLY