v2571x-953
SUBJECT INDEX
Page
Jurisdiction 1
Statement of Case 2
Questions Involved and How Raised 3
- Paramount's Authorized Business in Oregon ... 3
II. Did Paramount repudiate, as Charles P.
Brewer alleges 3
What Franchise was in effect 4
The Franchise 4
Admissions 4
Modificatioin 5
(a) Time when modified 5
(b) Terms of Modification 5
(i) Mr. T. C. Sibert's Claim 5
(ii) Mr. Brewer's Claim 6
(c) Duration of Modification 8
First Period 8
Second Period (1st Extension) 9
Third Period (2nd Extension) .: 9
(d) Conduct of Parties under Modification 10
(i) July 1 to Dec. 31, 1946 10
(ii) Jan 1, 1947 to March 15, 1947 11
(iii) March 15, 1947 11
(iv) Accountings 12
(e) Termination of Modification 15
- Final Period of Reinstated Franchise 17
(a) Testimony of Reinstatement 17
(b) Circumstances showing Reinstate-
ment (Six in number) 18
Conclusions 22
No Repudiation by Paramount 23
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2571x
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2571x
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2571x#page/n952/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
brewer, franchise, paramount, 1947, conspiracy, business, sibert, july, modification, dollar, repudiation, contract, 1946, payment, 2d
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
fran chise, pest control, evi dence, damaging overt, para mount, net profits, competitive business, busi ness, 475 ., stitch machine, modified franchise, march 1947, january 1st, december 31, brewer testifies
Document Status: UGLY