v2583-107

No. 12258.

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

1. 1. Stauffer and Stauffer System, Inc.,

Appellants,

Kathleen Exley,

Appellee.

REPLY BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS-

APPELLANTS.

Forrest F. Murray,

1010 Ninth and Broadway Building, Los Angeles 14,

Harris, Kiech, Foster & Harris,

Ford Harris, Jr.,

Jack Barry, Jr.,

321 Subway Terminal Building, Los Angeles 13,

Attorneys for Appellants.

UU

Parker & Company, Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2583

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2583

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2583#page/n106/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

repeal, code, lanham, courts, argument, statutes, district, jurisdiction, judicial, implication, repealed, trade, laws, jur, actions

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

district courts, judicial code, american jurisprudence, trade mark, unfair competition, specific repeal, sole argument, los angeles, legislative history, juris diction, im plication, expressly negatives, competition actions, code expressly, unfair competition.

Document Status: UGLY