v2651-877

No. 12,594

IN THE

United States

Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

1. 1. Taylor, Seaton Porter, Henry W.

Butler, R. W. Hammill, W. E. Hamilton,

Francis Blossom, D. J. Walsh, Harrison

' Smith, P. S. Pelletier, Wynn Meredith, In-

dividually and Doing Business as Sanderson

& Porter and Sanderson & Porter, a Part-

nership,

(Defendants) Appellants,

vs.

John E, Hubbell and Wilma Hubbell,

Appellees.

Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Com-

pany, a Corporation, and The Industrial

Commission of Arizona, a Public Agency,

(Intervenors) Appellants,

vs.

John E. Hubbell and Wilma Hubbell,

Appellees.

Defendants-Appellants' Reply Brief

Upon Appeal from the District Court of the United StatCta I I m' Pj

for the District of Arizona. 1 I L- Vmm, ImJ

OCT ^5 1950

Conner & Jones p^uL P. O'BRIEN,

Gerald Jones ql

303-7 Valley National Building

Tucson, Arizona

Attorneys for Defendants-

Appellants.

PARKER PRINTING COMPANY, 180 FIRST STREET, SAN FRANCISCO

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2651

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2651

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2651#page/n876/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

section, employee, arizona, contract, employer, compensation, independent, right, pac, ariz, relationship, hubbell, contractor, 56, tucson

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

independent contractor, sanderson porter, industrial commission, section 56, employer independent, agency section, 56 949, employer employee, employee relationship, xviii section, wilma hubbell, weddock 65, federal courts, defend ants, article xviii

Document Status: UGLY