v2672-527

No. 12,777

IN THE

United States

Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Fenwal, Incorporated, a corpora-

tion,

Plaintiff -Appellant

vs.

1. Ray Montgomery, Frederick H.

Montgomery and Montgomery

Brothers, a partnership,

Defendant-Appellees

Appellant's Reply Brief

Morris M. Doyle

Walker Lowry

Joseph W. Grossman

Attorneys for Appellant

McCutchen, Thomas, Matthew,

Griffiths & Greene

Jti

1500 Balfour Building

351 California Street

San Francisco 4, California

w

GU&HK

Of Counsel

PARKER PRINTING COMPANY. 180 FIRST STREET. SAN FRANCISCO

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2672

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2672

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2672#page/n526/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

montgomery, fenwal, orders, contract, shipments, refusal, obligation, customers, mont, gomery, february, refused, profit, payment, mass

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

mont gomery, montgomery refused, goods shipped, fen wal, san francisco, quasi contract, montgomery brothers, 73 34, 309 mass., withholding payment, walker lowry, thus montgomery, thomas matthew, street san, section 1440

Document Status: UGLY