v2728-434

146

contract, or that it had any interest in the sn)),iect

matter of the snpplemental action, but it also shielded

from the jurisdiction, parties to the contract whose

rights it sought to aifect by the decree which it prayed,

who could later question the validity of the acts done

pursuant to the decree, and who would not ))(' ))()und

by the decree or held answerable for their admitted

breach of the contract sought to be performed.

Such a judgment cannot stand. It must be reversed.

Dated, Fe)ruary 7, 1952.

Respectfully submitted,

1. 1. Cooke,

Thomas A. Cooke,

Francis T. Cornish,

Attorneys for AppeUant,

Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc.

Douglas A. Busey,

Attorney for AppeUant,

Pioche Mines Company.

Francis T. Cornish,

Attorney for Appellant,

John Janney.

Bruce R. Thompson,

Attorney for Appellant,

Richard K. Baker.

(Appendices Nos. One, Two, Three and Four Follow.)

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2728

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2728

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2728#page/n433/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

fidelity, settlement, holders, debenture, witnesses, ed, ct, credibility, securities, pioche, mines, clark, issue, conspiracy, allege

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

debenture holders, pioche mines, holders committee, mines consolidated, settlement agree, philadelphia trust, fidelity philadelphia, defend ant, holders commit, fidelity refusing, exchange commission, commit tee, whose rights, ward 140, triable issue

Document Status: UGLY