v2843-343

Nos. 13,992, 13,993 and 13,994

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Wong Wing Foo,

vs.

Appellant,

1. Howard McGrath, as Attorney General

of the United States,

Appellee.

Lew Shek Shan, et al..

Appellants,

vs.

No. 13,992

1. Howard McGrath, as Attorney General

of the United States,

Appellee.

Wong Ying, et al..

Appellants,

vs.

1. Howard McGrath, as Attorney General

of the United States,

Appellee.

^ No. 13,993

No. 13,994

(CONSOLIDATE

CASES)

J-/LEE

CONSOLIDATED BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS. .

'iovio

Chow AND SiNG^'^iJL P. O'BRfe^

550 Montgomery Street, San Francisco 11, C-alifornia,

Attorneys for Appellants.

1

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2843

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2843

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2843#page/n342/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

rules, substitution, 2d, 1953, district, mcgrath, howard, procedure, office, federal, civil, actions, nationality, courts, supp

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

howard mcgrath, lew shek, shek shan, federal rules, civil procedure, section 503, civil procedure., wong ying, wong wing, wing foo, substantive rights, below erred, koike 164, january 27, italics ours.

Document Status: UGLY