v2888-1234

Document Title Page

8

events had occurred which fixed the liability of the

United States to pay Appellants 90 per cent of the

sum of $136,528.34 paid to Appellants pursuant to

Periodical Estimate No. 6 (Petitioners' Ex. 7 below)

and such finding is contrary to the evidence.

IV.

The Tax Court of the United States erred in con-

cluding as a matter of law that 90 per cent of the sum

of $136,528.34 paid Appellants pursuant to Periodical

Estimate No. 6 (Petitioners' Ex. 7 below) accrued

as income to Appellants during the tax year 1942

under the accrual method of accounting.

The Tax Court of the United States erred in

failing to find as a fact that Periodical Estimate

No. 6 (Petitioners' Ex. 7 below) was not certified

until January, 1943.

VI.

The Tax Court of the United States erred in

failing to conclude as a matter of law that the

sum of $136,528.34 paid Appellants pursuant to

said Periodical Estimate No. 6 (Petitioners' Ex. 7

below) accrued to Appellants as income for the tax

year 1943.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2888

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2888

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2888#page/n1233/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

income, tax, fixed, 1943, right, contract, harmon, basis, 34, taxpayer, paid, fee, ed, construction, receive

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

purchase price, periodical estimate, fixed fee, gross income, accounting period, tax payer, spring city, region viii, regional labor, reasonably ascertainable, internal revenue, income tax, fixed determined, enforceable right, contract price

Document Status: UGLY