v2940-1277

/

Lstinction to be observed is between

o distinct grounds in support of a

ction are alleged, one only of wliich

al question, and a case where two

stinct causes of action are alleged,

ch is federal in character. In the

he federal question averred is not

; in substance, the federal court,

federal ground be not established,

5s retain and dispose of the case

deral ground ; in the latter it may

he non-federal cause of action."

Ls that in the case at bar appellee's

3ting recovery of damages arising

of her several properties, involve

it causes of action. This is vastly

ctual situation in the case of Hum

?e was involved claims of inf ringe-

mpetition resting upon identical

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2940

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2940

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2940#page/n1276/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

federal, violation, support, robinson, occurred, home, ground, fraudulent, errion, civil, causes, 33, wliich, western, washington

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

western district, violation obviously, vastly ctual, sup ported, stinct causes, statements attributed, securities exchange, section 27, scheme occurred, ringe mpetition, properties involve, offending fraudulent, obviously relates, non federal, mpetition resting

Document Status: UGLY