v3093-723

Document Title Page

wm

No. 16141

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

The Coleman Company, Inc., a corporation.

Appellant,

vs.

Holly Manufacturing Company, a corporation.

Appellee.

Appendix to Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant

the Coleman Company, Inc.

PARKER, STANBURY, REESE & McGEE.

315 West Ninth Street,

I/)s Angeles 15, California,

Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant

The Coleman Company, Inc.

Of Counsel:

TIMOTHY L. TILTON,

DAWSON, TILTON, FALLON & LUNGMUS,

209 South La Salle Street,

Chicago 4, Illinois.

JOHN F. EBERHARDT,

FOULSTON, SIEFKIN, SCHOEPPEL,

BARTLETT & POWERS,

608 Fourth National Bank Building,

Wichita 2, Kansas.

FILE

APR 2 3 1359

PAUL P. 'Dttltki CufeBis

Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-9171.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3093

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3093

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3093#page/n722/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

holly, coleman, air, sales, profit, br, damages, expenses, profits, manufacturing, engineering, wall, brown, heater, 31

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

pink air, net profit, bad faith, infringing air, engineering expenses, wall heaters, special master, selling expenses, ended december, wall heater, december 31, holly manufacturing, brown air, administrative engineering, profit margin

Document Status: UGLY