v3093-803

Document Title Page

No. 16141

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

The Coleman Company, Inc., a corporation.

Appellant,

vs.

Holly Manufacturing Company, a corporation,

Appellee.

Petition of Appellant, The Coleman Company, Inc., for

Rehearing, for Rehearing En Banc, and in the

Alternative for Clarification of the Court's

Opinion.

PARKER, STANBURY, REESE & McGEE,

315 West Ninth Street,

Los Angeles 15, California,

Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant

The Coleman Company, Inc.

Of Counsel:

TIMOTHY L. TILTON,

DAWSON, TILTON, FALLON & LUNGMUS,

209 South La Salle Street,

Chicago 4, Illinois.

JOHN F. EBERHARDT,

FOULSTON, siefkin,, SCHOEPPEL,

BARTLETT & POWERS,

608 Fourth National Bank Building, SEP 2 'j 1959

Wichita 2, Kansas.

FILE

PAUL P- O'BRIEN, CLERK.

Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3093

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3093

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3093#page/n802/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

coleman, holly, issue, faith, infringement, damages, br, award, patent, bad, sales, contempt, infringe, finding, air

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

bad faith, special master, pink air, modified heater, basic award, bad faith., rehearing en, infringing air, infringement issue, punitive damages, en banc, coleman acted, 1946 amendment, validity issue., testi mony

Document Status: UGLY