v3093-803
No. 16141
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
The Coleman Company, Inc., a corporation.
Appellant,
vs.
Holly Manufacturing Company, a corporation,
Appellee.
Petition of Appellant, The Coleman Company, Inc., for
Rehearing, for Rehearing En Banc, and in the
Alternative for Clarification of the Court's
Opinion.
PARKER, STANBURY, REESE & McGEE,
315 West Ninth Street,
Los Angeles 15, California,
Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant
The Coleman Company, Inc.
Of Counsel:
TIMOTHY L. TILTON,
DAWSON, TILTON, FALLON & LUNGMUS,
209 South La Salle Street,
Chicago 4, Illinois.
JOHN F. EBERHARDT,
FOULSTON, siefkin,, SCHOEPPEL,
BARTLETT & POWERS,
608 Fourth National Bank Building, SEP 2 'j 1959
Wichita 2, Kansas.
FILE
PAUL P- O'BRIEN, CLERK.
Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3093
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3093
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3093#page/n802/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
coleman, holly, issue, faith, infringement, damages, br, award, patent, bad, sales, contempt, infringe, finding, air
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
bad faith, special master, pink air, modified heater, basic award, bad faith., rehearing en, infringing air, infringement issue, punitive damages, en banc, coleman acted, 1946 amendment, validity issue., testi mony
Document Status: UGLY