v3165-813
No. 16282.
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Rexall Drug Company, a corporation, and Arnold
- Lewis, doing business as Studio Cosmetics Com-
pany,
Appellants,
vs,
Sandra Mae Nihill, etc.,
Appellee.
Reply Brief of Appellant Arnold L. Lewis, Doing
Business as Studio Cosmetics Company.
Reed, Callaway, Kirtland & Packard, -.. f. v^ jl
639 South Spring Street,
Los Angeles 14, California, AUG 1 9 1959
Henry E. Kappler, ^^^^ p O'BRlbiH. Cle
215 West Seventh Street,
Los Angeles 14, California,
Attorneys for Appellant Arnold L. Lewis, Doing
Business as Studio Cosmetics Company.
Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3165
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3165
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3165#page/n812/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
hair, thio, negligence, 2d, res, loquitur, ipsa, lewis, doctrine, bish, product, application, cosmetics, toxic, toni
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
res ipsa, studio cosmetics, ipsa loquitur, ipsa loquitur., inherently dangerous, permanent wave, liability ins., home mut., grand forks, forks imp., employers liability, burning sensation, bobby pins, 2d 62, utterly insufficient
Document Status: UGLY