9CHRIS / volumes / v3199 / v3199-335

v3199-335

Document Title Page

No. 16936

In the

MnxUh &tat0 Qlnurt at Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

EDWIN A. KAAKINEN, and KAAKINEN FISH

COMPANY,

L Appellants,

vs.

THE PEELERS COMPANY, a Partnership,

Appellee.

APPELLEE'S BRIEF

Ford E. Smith

    1. Keith

  2. Robert Theibault

Attorneys for Appellee

Ford E. Smith

734 Central Building-

Seattle 4, Washington

    1. Keith

Keith, Bolger, Isner & Byrne

122 East 42nd Street

New York 17, New York

  1. Robert Theibault ZIPD i

Wilkinson, Mawhinney & Theibault ^'^ ^1 196)

444 Munsey Building

Washington 4, D. C.

FfLED

^'^^^'H.SCHM,D,a,.K

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3199

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3199

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3199#page/n334/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

patent, art, claims, shrimp, machines, patents, combinations, machine, corn, rolls, combination, 355, 044, peeling, welsh

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

skrmetta machine, patent 355, corn husking, claimed combinations, pressure fingers, patent office, 044 patent, patent 828, patent 044, accused skrmetta, 828 patent, 355 patent, shrimp peeling, raw shrimp, transcript argument

Document Status: UGLY