v3201-1025

NO. 16989

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAROLD E. ROBINSON, JR. ,

Appellant,

vs.

REED-PRENTICE CORPORATION,

a corporation,

Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CENTRAL DIVISION

CLOSING BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

GRAHAM & RAY

By BYRON M. GRAHAM

and

1. 1. Blackman

315 West 9th Street

Los Angeles 15, California.

Attorneys for Appellant.

NOV ^Q

f RANK H

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3201

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3201

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3201#page/n1024/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

2d, respondent, cal, machine, app, valve, br, spool, res, closure, negligence, free, floating, design, caused

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

free floating, valve spool, floating spool, res ipsa, floating valve, possible causes, pilot valve, italics added, ipsa loquitur, undirected closure, respondent res., reed prentice, improper design, fair inference, safety orders

Document Status: UGLY