v3221-429
the instant case.
- The order of the Court is too broad in directing
the Company to execute the contract in view of
the fact that 3-1/2 years have elapsed since
certification; evidence should be taken as to
whether or not conditions are the same as during
the initial bargaining period.
Undersigned counsel certifies that this petition is not inter-
posed for delay and that in his judgment it is well founded.
Dated at Los Angeles, California this 26th day of July,
- .
SWEENEY, IRWIN & FOYE
/s/ Peter W. Irwin
PETER W. IRWIN
Attorneys for HOLLY-GENERAL
COMPANY, DIVISION OF SIEGLER
CORPORATION, Respondent.
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3221
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3221
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3221#page/n428/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
irwin, peter, view, undersigned, sweeney, siegler, respondent, posed, petition, period, los, july, inter, instant, initial
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
sweeney irwin, siegler corporation, los angeles, july 1962., irwin peter, irwin foye, inter posed, initial bargaining, corporation respondent., bargaining period., angeles california
Document Status: UGLY