v3222-57

not effect a waiver of that demand.

Ground 5: This Court obviously erred in holding that there "can

be no adequate remedy at law" (penultimate paragraph of decision)

in the present case where the remedy at law is fully adequate as to

the complaint and answer for which a jury trial has been demanded.

For each of the above reasons or grounds, this Court is

respectfully requested to reconsider and rehear this case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ W. D, SELLERS

WILLIAM DOUGLAS SELLERS

Attorney for Petitioners

John M. Shubin and Peter S. Shubin

CERTIFICATE

I hereby certify that in my judgment the foregoing Request

for Reconsideration and Rehearing is well founded and is not inter-

posed for delay

I si W. D. SELLERS

WILLIAM DOUGLAS SELLERS

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3222

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3222

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3222#page/n56/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

sellers, william, shubin, respectfully, remedy, douglas, adequate, waiver, submitted, si, requested, request, rehearing, rehear, reconsideration

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

william douglas, sellers william, douglas sellers, shubin certificate, sellers , respectfully submitted, respectfully requested, petitioners john, penultimate paragraph, obviously erred, inter posed, adequate remedy

Document Status: UGLY