v3237x-37

Document Title Page

SUBJECT INDEX

Page

Statement of the Case _ . . 1

Specification of Error No. 1 4

Specification of Error No. 2- 4

Argument: 5

  1. Preliminary Contention 5

It is not per se an unfair labor practice to

picket to enforce a subcontractor's clause.

  1. Arbitration Contention 6

(a) The issue involved hereunder is one

of first impression to the courts of this

nation 6

(b) The evidence compels a finding that

arbitration was the immediate and

sole objective of the picketing 7

(c) Policy is strongly in favor of arbitrat-

ing labor disputes 8

(d) The so-called "an object" test must be

interpreted in conjunction with the

"primary picketing" provision of the

law 9

(e) Mills was not "powerless to prevent"

the picketing as is required by the

Denver Building Trades case 12

  1. Insubstantial Evidence Contention 13

There is no substantial evidence to support

the Board's findings and order.

Specification of Error No. 3 16

Specification of Error No. 4 16

Specification of Error No. 5 16

Argument: Erroneous Exclusion of Evidence and

Reliance Thereon 17


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3237x

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3237x

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3237x#page/n36/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

nlrb, 2d, circ, local, specification, 1960, labor, 1963, trades, picketing, contention, argument, 9th, supp, steelworkers

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

9th circ., 8th circ., 2nd circ., winston bros., warrior gulf, universal camera, unfair labor, trades council, trades coun, teamsters 273, sole objective, seafarers internat, roofers 191, reporter para., reliance thereon

Document Status: UGLY