v3237x-61

21

Is it proper to infer that Respondent sought by its pick-

eting to have Mills cease doing business with Largent

when Respondent continued its picketing long after

Largent had completed his subcontract with Mills?

For the reasons stated, it is respectfully submitted

that a decree issue denying the enforcement of the

Board's order, or remanding the case to the Board for

further hearing including the evidence rejected, or or-

dering such relief as may be necessary and proper in

the circumstances.

Respectfully submitted,

Bailey, Swink and Gates,

Paul T. Bailey,

Ronald B. Lansing.

CERTIFICATE

The undersigned certifies that he has examined

the provisions of Rules 18 and 19 of this Court,

and in his opinion the tendered brief conforms to

all requirements.

Paul T. Bailey,

Of Attorneys for Respondent.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3237x

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3237x

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3237x#page/n60/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

respondent, bailey, submitted, respectfully, paul, mills, largent, undersigned, tendered, swink, subcontract, sought, rules, ronald, requirements

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

respectfully submitted, undersigned certifies, submitted bailey, respondent sought, respondent continued, pick eting, mills cease, issue denying, gates paul, bailey swink, bailey ronald

Document Status: UGLY