v3242x-237

No. 18,629

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Dymo Industries, Inc.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

Tapeprinter, Inc.

Defendant- Appellee.

PLAINTIFF=APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF

I L

McCutchen, Black, Harnagel & Shea,

1. Richard Doty,

Oakley C. Frost,

615 South Flower Street,

Los Angeles 17, California,

Gardner and Zimmerman,

Harris Zimmerman, J (J N

1737 First Western Building,

Oakland 12, California,

Hoppe and Mitchell,

Carl Hoppe,

2610 Russ Building,

San Francisco 4, California,

Attorneys for Plaintiff -Appellant.

FRANK H. SCHMID, CLERK

PERNAU-WALSH PRINTING CO., SAN FRANCISCO

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3242x

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3242x

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3242x#page/n236/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

mark, district, section, white, tape, black, cir, trade, goods, trademark, para, injunction, dutch, competition, word

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

black white, del monte, code title, trade mark, preliminary injunction, word dutch, unfair competition, 9th cir., tape printer, ward baking, tape writer, potter wrightington, national lead, exclusive right, trademark tapewriter

Document Status: UGLY