v3246-839

M-^'^'

NO. 16834

United States

COURT OF APPEALS

for the Ninth Circuit

RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO.

Appellant,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellant,

vs.

RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO.

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S and CROSS-APPEILEE'S REPLY BRIEF

Appeals horn the United States District Court

for the District oi Oregon.

Denton G. Burdick, Jr.,

Hutchinson, Schwab 85 Burdick,

712 Executive Building,

Portland 4, Oregon,

Attorneys for Appellant and Cross- Appellee.

BTEVENS-NEBS LAW PUB. CO.. PORTLAND. ORE.

9-60

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3246

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3246

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3246#page/n838/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

government, credit, tax, deficiency, refund, venture, joint, erroneous, f2d, statutory, rushlight, taxpayer, section, district, sprinkler

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

tax credit, joint venture, erroneous credit, rushlight automatic, automatic sprinkler, internal revenue, universal oil, tax payer, section 3746, section 275, revenue code, operating loss, net operating, government seeks, executive building

Document Status: UGLY