v3270-1366

10 James E. Thomas, et iix., vs.

and for such pain and suffering as he shall incur in

the future.

MESCH, JASPER, MARQUEZ

& ROTHSCHILD, and

HIRSCH, VAN SLYKE,

RICHTER & OLLASON,

By /s/ JOHN K. MESCH,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Receipt of copy acknowledged.

Endorsed : Filed July 19, 1961.

Title of District Court and Cause.

OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FINDINGS OF

FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND

JUDGMENT

Comes Now John K. Mesch, attorney for plaintiff,

and objects to findings of fact No. 3. Such finding

states in part as follows: "During or before the

month of September, 1960," for the reason and

upon the ground that the w^ords '^or before" were

not a part of the Court's finding as set forth in the

transcript of such findings on July 28, 1961. The

Court's findings in such transcript is as follows:

Hit * * i^^^i J gj-j^ from the plaintiff's own testimony

that in September, 1960, he knew not only that he

had a cause of action against jMerritt, Chapman

and Scott, that he could file, and also the alternative

to claim compensation." For this reason and on the

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3270

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3270

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3270#page/n1365/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

thomas, james, compensation, commission, mesch, scott, merritt, chapman, black, 1960, october, right, hill, corp, arizona

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

merritt chapman, james thomas., scott corp., chapman scott, industrial commission, receive compensation, written statements, scott corporation, october 1960, september 1960, lawrence ollason, nadie belle, mesch jasper, marquez rothschild, ledger card

Document Status: UGLY