v3276-155

Document Title Page

No. 17677

lit the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

CHENEY CALIFORNIA LUMBER COMPANY

Petitionery

vs.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Respondent.

PETITION TO REVIEW ORDER OF THE

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

FILEI

AUG 3 i ^

REPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONEffRANK H. SCHMID, Ci

Comfort, Dolack & Hansler,

Attorneys for Petitioner.

819 South Kay St.

Tacoma, Washington

CLINTON HULL PRINTING COMPANY


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3276

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3276

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3276#page/n154/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

strike, petitioner, section, respondent, unions, welfare, health, br, resp, bargaining, september, labor, violation, plan, notices

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

section 302, national labor, labor relations, welfare plan, welfare trust, wage reopening, strike clause, unfair labor, respondent resp., peti tioner, contract duration, collective bargaining, bad faith, welfare trust., unions demands

Document Status: UGLY