v3355-73

Document Title Page

No. 20122

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES, to the Use of A. R YOST,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

    1. DIXON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

    1. DIXON COMPANY, a corporation,

Cross-Complainant ,

vs.

VAN HARRIS, an individual doing business as HARRIS & SONS, ct al.,

Cross-Defendants.

UNITED STATES, to the Use of PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL,

INC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, et al,

Defendants.

Reply Brief of Appellees, Fidelity and Deposit

Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges

811 West Seventh Street,

Los Angeles, California,

'"'/.eo

Attorneys for Appellees. nliQ, 2q looc

Clerk

Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-9171.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3355

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355#page/n72/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

fees, miller, award, supp, california, code, alaska, statute, supra, fidelity, fee, deposit, itself, district, decision

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

government code, laws 1949, emphasis added, compiled laws, california policy, alaska compiled, added ., truck rental, respectfully submit, reliance ins., pro vided, philadelphia pa., paramount truck, fees incurred, cali fornia

Document Status: UGLY