v3355-91
No. 20121, 20122
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
and L. E. DIXON COMPANY,
Appellants,
vs.
VAN HARRIS, an individual, doing business as Harris & Sons,
Appellee.
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
and L. E. DIXON COMPANY,
Appellants,
vs.
PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., and VAN HARRIS,
an individual doing business as Harris & Sons,
Appellees.
PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC.,
Appellant,
vs.
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
and L. E. DIXON COMPANY,
Appellees.
On Appeal From the United States District Court for the
Southern District o California, Central Division.
Brief of Appellants L. E. Dixon Company and
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.
Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & KT* I I
Bridges,
James W. Baldwin, jUL 2 o i355
Robert K. Worrell,
Andrew J. Nocas, FRANK H. SCHMIO, CLEii;^
811 West Seventh Street,
Los Angeles, Calif. 90017,
Attorneys for Appellants L. E. Dixon
Company and Fidelity and Deposit
Company of Maryland.
Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3355
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355#page/n90/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
dixon, harris, contract, cal, yost, work, 2d, contractor, subcontract, paramount, subcontractor, district, perform, payment, bond
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
cal tech, payment bond, prime contractor, har ris, written subcontract, prime contract, written contract, para mount, van harris, sub contractor, principal contractor, paramount truck, move ins, ma terial, dixon breached
Document Status: UGLY