v3376-647

SUBJECT INDEX

Page

risdiction 1

Jurisdiction of the District Court 2

Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals 2

atement of the Case . _ 3

Parties and Origin of Action... 3

Feeding of Veneer Dryers Before and After Park-

er Invention 4

Problems Peculiar to Feeding Veneer 7

Development of Accused Apparatus 8

Nature of Invention 8

Comparison of Accused and Patented Apparatus 12

How Preferred Embodiment of Parker Operates 14

How an Alternative Embodiment of Parker Op-

erates 16

How Accused Apparatus Operates . 18

Action Subsequent to Remand 19

OSS Appellant's Specification of Errors 26

mmary of Argument 27

gument Infringement 29

Question Properly Before This Court 29

Claim 3 Is Infringed . 29

Language in Patent Interpreted by Under-

standing of Person Skilled in Art 31

Accused Apparatus Has Full Equivalent of

Parker Conveyor Type Table 36

Doctrine of Equivalents 37

Applying the Law to Case at Bar 42

Claims 5 and 7 Are Infringed 43

gument Damages 43

Interest on Damages 50

Defendants' Infringement Was Wilful and Plain-

tiff Should Be Awarded Exemplary Damages

and Attorney's Fees . 55

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3376

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3376

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3376#page/n646/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

rolls, veneer, patent, table, parker, infeed, conveyor, apparatus, outfeed, machine, accused, type, dryer, vol, claims

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

conveyor type, outfeed rolls, infeed rolls, type table, parker patent, pinch rolls, conveyor table, accused apparatus, rolls 34, 34 35, accused machine, outfeed rolls., vertically movable, outfeed pinch, royalty rate

Document Status: UGLY