v3377-417

CONCLUSION

The judgment of the Coui-t below should be reversed

and the District Court should be directed to assess

damages against Appellee, perhaps after further hear-

ings thereon.

Dated, Honolulu, Hawaii,

April 11, 1966.

Respectfully submitted,

HODDICK, ROTHWELL & ChANG,

By Robert M. Rothwell,

Attorneys for Appellants,

Certificate of Counsel

I certify that, in connection with the preparation

of this brief, I have examined Rules 18 and 19 of the

United States Court of Appeals, for the Ninth Cir-

cuit, and that, in my opinion, the foregoing brief is in

full compliance with those rules.

Robert M. Rothwell,

Attorney for Appellants,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3377

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3377

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3377#page/n416/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

rothwell, rules, robert, thereon, submitted, reversed, respectfully, preparation, perhaps, ings, honolulu, hoddick, hear, hawaii, examined

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

submitted hoddick, rothwell chang, respectfully submitted, ings thereon., honolulu hawaii, hoddick rothwell, hear ings, hawaii april, examined rules, cir cuit, assess damages

Document Status: UGLY