v3382-287

No. 20944

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant,

general partners doing business under the

firm name of Radiant Color Company,

Plamtis- Appellants,

vs.

SwiTZER Brothers, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appellants' Reply Brief

FILED

Carl Hoppe SEP - 9 1966

Ernest M. Anderson

2610 Russ Building tAiHii r%

San Francisco, California 94104 )NM* fi. LUCj^^ CLERK

Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants

SORG PRINTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, 346 FIRST STREET. SAN FRANCISCO 94105

NUV 4j3s

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3382

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3382

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3382#page/n286/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

switzer, radiant, test, resin, br, patent, sw, insoluble, quick, dr, hatcher, 2d, argument, qualitative, aromatic

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

quick qualitative, qualitative test, free flowing, aromatic hydrocarbon, substantially insoluble, radiant submits, hydrocarbon solvents, japanese resin, kazenas resin, title 35, remained free, 35 section, simple clear, section 112, manson 1966,

Document Status: UGLY