v3387-909

filed by Appellant. Accordingly, Appellant should not be sub-

jected to a doctrine, the only justification for which is that the

King of England could not be presumed to do wrong. See discussion

in 2 Davis Administrative Law, 1701, et seq. Also see Moser v .

^ited States . 341 U.S. 41, 71 S. Ct. 553, 95 L.ed. 729 (1951);

Great Northern i. Co. v. Reed , 270 U.S. 539, 546-7, 70 L.ed. 721,

725, (1926); Hillstrand v. State , 395 P. 2d 74, 77 (Alaska 1964);

Knoble v. Qrr , 27 L.D. 61 (1898).

Respectfully submitted,

FISHER 6c H0R1IADAY

Attorneys for Appellant

imes C. Hornada^

20 December, 1966.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3387

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3387

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3387#page/n908/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

ed, wrong, submitted, sub, seq, respectfully, reed, qrr, presumed, northern, moser, knoble, king, justification, jected

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

submitted fisher, sub jected, respectfully submitted, reed 270, qrr 27, fisher 6c, december 1966., davis administrative, alaska 1964, 77 alaska, 74 77, 729 1951, 725 1926, 721 725, 6c h0r1iaday

Document Status: UGLY