v3390-367

No. 21,020

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Eliska Edwards,

A ppellant,

vs.

T'acifto Fruit Express Company,

Appellee.

Appeal from Summary Judgment by the United States District

Court for the Northern District of California

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF

Werchtctv & Werchick,

Jack H. Werchick,

^Vrne Werchick,

240 Second Street,

San Francisco, California 94105,

Attorneys for Appellant.

APri2.1967

Fll-ED

APR 2 01357

SNM. B. LUCK, CLERK

PRINTINO GO.. MAN FRANC

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3390

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3390

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3390#page/n366/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

ed, railroad, ct, 2d, common, pacific, express, interstate, commerce, section, federal, operations, carriers, cal, southern

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

interstate commerce, southern pacific, federal employers, employers liability, common carriers, common carrier, express agency, 645 59, fruit express, ap pellee, 54 stat., railway express, phrase common, pacific fruit, liberty glass

Document Status: UGLY