v3454-675

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NO. CIVIL

21981

/

3ENJAMIN F. MARLOWE,

VS.

Appellant,

1. FRANK COAKLEY, Individually, and as

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, STATE

DF CALIFORNIA, LOWELL JENSEN, Individually,

and as ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF

ALAMEDA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, C.

HERBERT, Individually, and as INSPECTOR

for the DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ALAMEDA

COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, FIRST,

SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH,

SEVENTH, EIGHTH, NINTH, and TENTH DOES,

XYZ COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Appellee.

FILED

APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF

OCT 1 1967

WM. B. LUCK, CLERK

0CT1819P7

BENJAMIN F. MARLOWE

Attorney for Appellant

508 - 16th Street

Oakland, California

836-1860

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3454

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3454

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3454#page/n674/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

district, grand, 2d, california, immunity, rights, respondents, county, civil, alameda, indictment, color, willfully, process, conduct

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

alameda county, absolute immunity, quasi judicial, civil rights, ronan 351, malicious prosecution, diligent inquiry, ca 2d, 9th cir., rights privileges, norris 300, lowell jensen, immunities secured, frank coakley, constitutional rights

Document Status: UGLY