v3454-735
/ '
Nos. 21982 and 21982A
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STANFORD GOODMAN, doing business as
LINDO ENGINEERING, also known as
- STANFORD GOODMAN, HARTFORD
ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY,
a corporation,
Appellants,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to the use
of JOHN P. RINEER, doing business as
RINEER OIL SURFACING,
Appellee.
-".
=C1
OtC I * 67
m . B. LUCK. CLEW
- STANFORD GOODMAN, doing business as
LINDO ENGINEERING, HARTFORD ACCIDENT
AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation,
Appellants,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to the use of
TURLOCK ROCK COMPANY, a corporation,
Appellee.
FILED
DEC 1 8 1967
MM. B, LUCK, CLERK
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of California
APPELLEE'S BRIEF
MURPHY AND WARNISHER
Richard J. Murphy
1343 W. Valencia, Suite A
Fullerton, California
Attorneys for Appellee.
JOHN P. RINEER
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3454
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3454
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3454#page/n734/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
2d, findings, specification, rineer, lines, goodman, contract, sand, finding, cal, raised, issue, rules, price, materials
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
stanford goodman, turlock rock, lindo engineering, federal rules, civil procedure, hartford accident, jay forrest, issue raised, goodman guaranteed, eastern district, conforming pleadings, clearly distinguishable, asserted authorities, 2d 447, witkin summary
Document Status: UGLY