v3454-765

Nos. 21982 and21982A

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

1. STANFORD GOODMAN d/b/a

LINDO ENGINEERING, et al. ,

Appellant,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

exrelJOHNP. RINEER, d/b/a

RINEER OIL SURFACING,

vs.

Appellee.

1. STANFORD GOODMAN d/b/a

LINDO ENGINEERING, et al. ,

Appellant,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel

TURLOCK ROCK COMPANY,

Appellee.

FILED

NOV 3 1967

1. 1. LUCK, CLERK

mw,

13V 1 5 1967

3 JCK, CLE

Appeal From the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of California

APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF

MARSH AND GRAVES

505 No. Mollison, Suite 201

El Cajon, California 92021

Attorneys for Appellant.

BOHNERT, FLOWERS & MCCARTHY

369 Pine Street

San Francisco, California 94104

Associated Attorneys for Appellant.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3454

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3454

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3454#page/n764/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

rineer, sand, goodman, contract, turlock, rep, job, type, work, specifications, sub, government, price, ton, project

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

concrete sand, sub contract, turlock rock, sub contractor, stanford goodman, plaster sand, lindo engineering, government accepted, goodman guaranteed, air force, 1965 goodman, written subcontract, written contract, rineer assumed, rineer arbitrarily

Document Status: UGLY