v3460-452

The Wirkkala patent, 2,786,709

hibit 117) and the Colloni et al pat

fendaut's Exhibit 112), discussed c

Defendants- Appellees' Brief, were

Examiner and considered in detail

cntion of the Lindberg patent a

tiff's Exhibit 2, pages 15 and 30).

and Collom et al devices are to

function quite differently from g

noted that these devices do not uti

for exerting a strong lateral "s(

on the object being lifted as in the

The cable 8 of Collom et al and thi

kala operate to open the jaws n

them. In the case of prior art log

which the Wirkkala patent is an

the jaws are provided with sharp

points 12 of Wirkkala, which dig

the log and which must be manual

The log actually "hangs" from th

With regard to the showing o:

I

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3460

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3460

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3460#page/n451/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

patent, grapple, lindberg, jenkins, jaws, practice, invention, application, structure, infringement, admissions, language, fig, accused, 2d

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

patent application, lindberg patent, hunt patent, grapple structure, accused device, wirkkala patent, unbalanced grip, type grapple, portland oregon, patent matters., pads 55, non infringing, march 1958, lindberg application, basket type

Document Status: UGLY