v3490-301

^^^i'Gi'OCQ

^ V^ V

IN THE

MnxUh SMm dmirt of AppmUyiJ.

For the Ninth Circuit I , V^ I ^

No. 21235

CLAIROL INCOEPORATED,

Petitioner,

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Respondent.

On Petition to Review An Okdee of the Federal Trade

Commission

PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF

Landels, Ripley, Gregory & Diamond,

235 Montgomery Street,

San Francisco, California 94104.

Weil and Lee,

60 East 42nd Street,

New York, New York 10017.

Attorneys for Petitioner,

Clairol Incorporated.

Gilbert H. Weil,

Philip E. Diamond,

of counsel. F I I F r

J '. ijub

WM. B. LUCK. CLERK

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3490

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3490

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3490#page/n300/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

commission, products, clairol, section, resale, retailers, salons, meaning, congress, word, services, retailer, hair, trade, supreme

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

corn products, robinson patman, trade commission, federal trade, beauty salons, trade reg., cooperative promotional, congress intended, cert denied, cch trade, beauty salon, advertising allowances, usual meaning, retailer customer, promotional programs

Document Status: UGLY